Z is el vivant! The Left lives and thrives in Greece

greece_election_results.gif

I don't know how many of you have seen the excellent Costa Gavras film, "Z". It is a French adaptation of real life events in Greece, where progressive peacenik Grigoris Lambrakis was killed by fascist goons in the service of the right wing military supported political leadership; and investigations into which were led by a daring and honest investigator only for convictions to be overturned and the military dictatorship to be instated in the country in 1967. The film's message is that "he" (Lambakris' fictional version referred to as Z) is alive - in the movements for justice and dissent against the right wing regime. 

Gavras would have been glad to see the current verdict of the recently concluded general elections in Greece, where forces from the Left represented by the SYRIZA (Coalition of the Radical Left), the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) and the ANTARSYA (Front of the Greek anti-capitalist Left) managed a cumulative vote percentage of 27% outstripping the rightists (led by the New Democracy party and represented by other fringe extreme rightists) and the centrists in the long ruling Socialist Party (PASOK) in popular support. Z is finally alive, he would think, and not just on film, but in real life in Greece. 

The verdict for the Left was because of the popular anger against the austerity measures put in place by the preceding Greek governments and supported by the PASOK and ND - measures that were instituted to apparently tide over the Sovereign Debt Crisis in the country. The crisis in itself was a creation not of the doings of the working people and who were to be most affected because of the austerity measures, but of the rapacity of finance capital which led to the Global Financial Crisis.

The allies of Finance Capital in Greece, the dominant political parties - against massive public opinion - once again kowtowed to a series EU and IMF imposed loan agreements that imposed unprecedented burdens on the Greek people. Financial Crisis inevitably brought about Political Crisis as thousands of Greek people took to the streets in waves of protests over the past two years, as Greece tottered on the brink of a socio-economic crisis with poverty and unemployment increasing rapidly. It is in this context that the Coalition of the Radical Left - the SYRIZA and the KKE managed to win the support of the people beyond what they had managed ever before. 

The success of the SYRIZA in particular was outstanding. The SYRIZA managed a swing of 12.2% vote in its favour to win 16.9% of the total vote, while the KKE also managed a rise in vote share by one percentage point to 8.5%. 

The SYRIZA has consistently opposed the austerity agreements and has called unequivocally for reneging on the conditionalities imposed by the EU. It is no wonder that it got its best support in the major cities of Greece in Athens, Thessaloniki and Patras. Whoever said that the ideas of the Left were passé have to eat their words now. The SYRIZA and KKE have cumulatively brought back the Left in vogue in Greece and therefore in Europe.

Unfortunately, from the statements we see, KKE has so far refused to respond to SYRIZA and its young President Alexis Tsipras' call for a united Left Front post the elections. The details seem murky for long distance watchers. But KKE’s characterisation of SYRIZA as a set of "new social democrats" supplanting the PASOK seems to defy the fact that SYRIZA is clearly opposed to PASOK's support for the austerity programmes and its supplicant attitude toward finance capital. SYRIZA resembles the 21st century version of the Left - the "New Left" - a coalition of the radical Left, social movements, ecological Left and sections drawn from communist youth. 

The KKE suggests that not just a reversal of the austerity measures is in order, but there must be a restoration of the privileges of the working people and the hegemony of the popular government in deciding matters instead of the mandarins in service of global finance. From the proclamations of the SYRIZA, there is not much difference with the KKE on this accord, except that the former prefers Greece to stay within the European Union without being in the Eurozone (common currency). And a closer look at the platforms suggest that programmatically, there is not much difference in the immediate between the two leftist organisations, although there is a more pronounced pro-ecological and radical-democratic content to the SYRIZA than in the KKE. 

The KKE should perhaps loosen up its dogmatic position and accept the peoples' verdict and stand in unison with SYRIZA against Greece's "primary contradiction" - the rampaging finance capital that is determining its macroeconomic policies through remote control. Perhaps the KKE is better off in understanding that the 20th century notion of building a proletarian state through “only” the vanguard of the self-proclaimed representative of the working class, the communist party, is that much - a 20th century idea that needs refinement. Perhaps the KKE should look at the examples in Germany and France provided by the Die Linke and the Left Front (Jean Luc Melenchon performed creditably in the recently held French presidential elections). And perhaps so should the communist parties in the rest of the world in getting inspired by what the Latin American Leftists are doing in their way of praxis: creatively combining Marxism with the ideas of Antonio Gramsci and the Peruvian revolutionary, Jose Carlos Mariategui.

Your rating: None Average: 3.8 (23 votes)

Comments

KKE Apologists Should Shut Up Now and Introspect

The elections results have come and the people of Greece have spoken. Unfortunately, the pro-austerity ND has emerged as the largest party with almost 30% of the vote share, up from 19% in May 2012. Along with the pro-austerity PASOK (12%), they can form a government, with a slight majority.

SYRIZA has finished a close second, with 27% of the votes. It has gained over 10% in its vote share since the May 2012 elections. It is a highly creditable performance and progressives everywhere should express solidarity with this newly emergent radical Left force. SYRIZA must intensify its resistance against the neoliberal austerity measures and the EU-IMF conditionalities, because they have the mandate of a large section of the Greek population. Many congratulations to Alexis Tsipras for his charismatic, level headed and inspiring leadership.

The KKE and its apologists should shut up for a while, because within one month its vote share has declined by 4% - from 8.5% in May to 4.5% now. It is clear that nearly half of their supporters have voted for the SYRIZA. This is a punishment for their sectarian obduracy to cooperate with SYRIZA. If the KKE wants to restore its credibility, it should do self-criticism, rectify its rigid and dogmatic positions and build broad based alliance with SYRIZA to fight neoliberal austerity and EU-IMF imperialism.

The blog that has been quoted

The blog that has been quoted to compare the programmes of the Greek parties is totally unreliable. And to say that there is not "programmatically, there is not much difference in the immediate between the two leftist organisations" is not correct.
SYRIZA's proposals can be read here:
http://greekleftreview.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/syriza-proposal-the-exit...
KKE's analysis:
http://inter.kke.gr/News/news2012/2012-05-23-arthro
The full programme of the KKE:
http://inter.kke.gr/Documents/docprogr/

As if the SYRIZA programme wasn't inadequate enough, SYRIZA President Alexis Tsipras has written in the Financial Times to dispel all doubts, vowing to keep Greece in the eurozone. Getting out of the eurozone, imposing capital controls and nationalizing banks have to be the starting point for any left programme for Greece. Thus the KKE does not seem to be far off the mark in saying that SYRIZA is selling illusions.

SYRIZA's rise is not a proof of their programme being the appropriate one.
To quote from here - http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/119521, "Greek opinion polls show widespread opposition to austerity but continued faith in the euro and the EU. This accounts for Syriza's stratospheric rise - it has tapped into a popular illusion."

Here's the link to Tsipras's article:
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/4c44a296-b3b3-11e1-a3db-00144feabdc0.html...

Excerpts from the article:

"Lest there be any doubt, my movement – Syriza – is committed to keeping Greece in the eurozone.

President Barack Obama was right when he said last Friday: “Let’s do everything we can to grow now, even as we lock in a long-term plan to stabilise our debt and our deficits, and start bringing them down in a steady, sensible way.” That applies to my country, too. The need for giving Greece a chance for real growth and a new future is now more widely accepted than ever.

Syriza is the only political movement in Greece today that can deliver economic, social and political stability for our country. The stabilisation of Greece in the short term will benefit the eurozone at a critical juncture in the evolution of the single currency. If we do not change our path, austerity threatens to force us out of the euro with even greater certainty... A renewed Greece will contribute to the new foundations of a closer, more unified Europe... The people of Greece want to replace the failed old memorandum of understanding (as signed in March with the EU and International Monetary Fund) with a “national plan for reconstruction and growth”. This is necessary both to avert Greece’s humanitarian crisis and to save the common currency...

Under our plan for reconstruction and growth, we are committed to following a programme of pragmatic and socially just fiscal stabilisation. The structure of this programme consists of: stabilising public expenditure at approximately 44 per cent of GDP and reorientating this expenditure to ensure it is well spent; increasing revenues from direct taxation to the average European levels (by more than 4 per cent of GDP) over a four-year period; and reforming the tax regime so as to identify the wealth and income of all citizens, and to distribute equitably the burden of taxation.

We will ensure that viable banks are recapitalised transparently and in a way that is fully compatible with the public interest. That is the only way to ensure that the entire financial system is returned to full stability."

Greek election result

Appeals for unity mean nothing unless they are accompanied by agreement on a programme for government. The problem is that Syrizia wants contradictory things. It is no good appealing to the electorate on the basis of reversing the conditions imposed on Greece by the Troika without proposing a concrete set of policies to deal with the consequences of such a rejection, which inevitably would entail an exit from the Euro. Syrizia refuse to do this and want to enmesh the KKE in an electoral arrangement in which the communists are compelled to abandon a central plank of their policy.
It is as if the CPM was asked to form a government by a potential ally but accept the existing relationship with the USA as a condition of participating in government.
Nick Wright
http://21stcenturymanifesto.wordpress.com/

Battle against opportunism, "left government" and entrapment

Comrades;

The program of KKE and Syriza are totally irreconcilable - as the program of KKE is an program against imperialism and the bourgeois while the program of Syriza is a program of cooperation with imperialism and the bourgeois.

The only way forward for the Hellenic working class and people are the strenghtening of the political-social antiimperialist antimonopoly alliance, the front against imperialism, for workers-peoples power and socialism with a strong and powerful KKE leading the struggle.

For more information on KKEs positions: inter.kke.gr

Comradely,

Vegard Thonstad, Tiller - Norway

@nick

agreement on a programme emerges out of discussions, which the KKE has refused to enter into despite SYRIZA's offer. the comparison with the CPIM is out of place because a situation where Left forces together get 25% of the national vote has never emerged in India. If SYRIZA is just another PASOK in the making, as per the KKE's prognosis, why did they not compromise and form a coalition government with PASOK? let us wait for the next round of elections on June 17 and see how the Greek people view the positions of SYRIZA and KKE before drawing hard conclusions. if the SYRIZA gains further, it will be a vindication of their position.

Syriza's illusions

" If SYRIZA is just another PASOK in the making, as per the KKE's prognosis, why did they not compromise and form a coalition government with PASOK?"
Because Pasok is in favour of the austerity package imposed by the Troika whilst Syriza is opposed.
Syriza is gambling that the contradiction between its opposition to the austerity programme – which is the basis of its big increase in votes –and its desire to stay within the common EURO currency will not be tested. It hopes that the desire of the dominant powers in the EU to keep Greece in the Euro (for fear that an exit will have a domino effect) will be greater than the risks of letting them go.
If Syriza is right Greece will remain in the Euro and still subject to continuing austerity. If they are wrong Syriza's illusions will be pictured along with their ballooning vote.
http://21centurymanifesto.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/syrizas-eu-illusions/

A related article

Greece: SYRIZA, the Communist Party and the desperate need for a united front
http://links.org.au/node/2863

Trash

A lesson in anti-communism and bourgeois opportunism is the only thing this article has to offer anyone.

KKE is the principal force of the revolution in Greece and Europe.

Viva Papariga!
Viva KKE!
Kappa- Kappa-Epsilon!

That article is equally, or

That article is equally, or even more, sectarian than KKE's positions. For the author, the position of the communists that Greece should get out of the European Union is merely "formally correct from a left standpoint"! This is nothing but a trivialisation of the issue at hand.

He further claims that most members of the KNE (KKE's youth organisation) left it to join NAR and that they are in Antarsya and so on. Then why is it that the KNE that most of us who follow the developments in Greece have heard of is the KNE of KKE? How is it that KNE is still a big mass organisation?

I was wondering who this author Michael Karadjis is, and found this:
http://gowans.wordpress.com/category/che-guevera/

a solid article in the given

a solid article in the given situation.

Z is el vivant! The Left lives and thrives in Greece

Just because "The SYRIZA managed a swing of 12.2% vote in its favour to win 16.9% of the total vote, while the KKE" (comparatively) only "managed a rise in vote share by one percentage point to 8.5%", cannot lead to a conclusion that the political position of the SYRIZA is more revolutionary than that of the KKE.

Therefore, your conclusion that "The KKE should perhaps loosen up its dogmatic position and accept the peoples' verdict and stand in unison with SYRIZA", tantamounts to asking for the capitulation of a correct political position to a momentary electoral result.

The programme of a Communist Party cannot be decided by what the people vote for in an election.

Hence the position taken by the KKE not to participate in the government-formation, correctly reflects the steadfastness of their programatic resolve while at the same time respecting the popular verdict which is clearly based not on the acceptance of a revolutionary programme for the present condition of the Greek people, but on merely the venting of " the popular anger ".

-Thalmann Pereira (Goa)

KKE

http://inter.kke.gr/News/news2012/2012-05-08-cc-statement , KKE clearly declares what they want and explains the situation prevailing in Greece, things have not yet reached an impasse but an alliance with SYRIZA would definitely mar the radicalization of the people further as the SYRIZA is still in favour of staying inside Euro Zone and have no specific plans to rein the monopoly capital. the rise of the Golden Dawn is another alarming feature. the centrists and centre to lefts and social democrats are always seen to adjust with them.

KKE's fallacies

the KKE statement actually exposes its fallacies. For instance: "The KKE assesses the election results and tendencies with the objective conditions as its criterion, it does not determine its stance based on the electoral strength or electoral shrinkage of the other political parties." If the electoral strength or shrinkage of political parties is not a reflection of "objective conditions", then what is? Why contest elections then?

As per KKE's analysis the elections results are an outcome of people's anger with austerity but laden with "illusions" that the system can be reformed through immediate measures. This is KKE's explanation for SYRIZA getting 16-17% of the votes (gaining over 12%) while KKE received 8-9% (up by less than 1%). So a preference for SYRIZA's proposals to cancel the EU-IMF loan conditionalities, renegotiate the loans and reverse the austerity measures over KKE's call for a socialist revolution ("disengagement from the EU and the unilateral cancellation of the debt, the socialization of the means of production, the productive cooperatives of the people, the nationwide planning...") is explained away as nothing but mere "illusions" on the part of the people.

Perhaps the people are more interested in what is doable on an immediate basis to provide relief. Why make reforms the enemy of revolution? Why can't peoples support be galvanized through radical reforms and move towards more revolutionary steps on that basis? A dialogue between SYRIZA and KKE on the programmatic content of a future government would surely open up these questions.

Rather than showing such courage and confidence the KKE is adopting an escapist position under the garb of classical sectarianism: "The KKE will not support any government, no matter what its composition, which will emerge from the post-election collaboration of the parties, whatever title it may have. This government will not provide anything positive for the people. On the contrary it will respond to the needs and interests of capital, the choices of the EU and IMF. For the KKE to agree to participate in a government, the party would not have to simply carry out a small retreat, but it would have to turn its programme and political line upside down, and make unacceptable compromises regarding the present and future of the people’s interests. The people do not need such a KKE."

The people of Greece have decisively rejected the PASOK and ND for surrendering to EU-IMF conditionalities and delivered a clear mandate against the neoliberal austerity measures. A large section dumped the PASOK in favour of the SYRIZA. Even the rightwing parties which have gained in vote share have contested elections in an anti-austerity platform. The people want an immediate alternative. Any Communist or Left force worth its salt should rise up to the occasion and respond positively to this people's mandate.

if my memory dont betray me

if my memory dont betray me Hitler had a support of 33% of the voters in the 1932 election does that define anything ? http://inter.kke.gr/News/news2012/2012-05-09-aristeri-kyvernisi and it is another link lets find out what KKE is saying

hitler got 36.8% votes in the

hitler got 36.8% votes in the 1932 presidential elections in germany. although he lost to incumbent president paul hindenburg (who got 53% of the national vote), this election marked hitler's rise and therefore defined a major shift in the correlation of forces in germany in favour of the nazis. two years down the line in 1934 hindenburg died and hitler abolished the post of president and became the fuhrer. the short point is that elections matter..

the KKE statement that you cite is further proof of their sectarianism. they are rejecting SYRIZA's progressive policy platform which includes rejection of the EU-IMF bailout conditionalities, cancellation of anti-labour laws, political reforms to deepen democracy and establish public control of the banking system. for the KKE these proposals are not radical enough. they want Greece to immediately break from the EU and would not accept anything short of that. the problem is that this strident anti-EU position is not shared by an overwhelming majority of the Greek electorate. the Greek people are surely anti-austerity and anti-Euro but not anti-EU. It is this position that SYRIZA is trying to champion.

KKE's position is only going to harm its own prospects. if no government can be formed now and fresh elections are forced on the people, the SYRIZA will gain much further in voteshare:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/10/us-greece-poll-idUSBRE84915C20...

it's not necessary to direct

it's not necessary to direct KKE's all efforts towards parliament,elections, alliances as the case of Hitler portrays there is very little space for conscious voting as whole in the existing 'democratic' system and another noteworthy element is that there is a decrease of 5.9% [567.855] participation of voters from 2009 elections, had it been a popular upsurge against ND and PASOK and for SYRIZA this decrease is inexplicable. another point is- how many of the total Greek adult population are at all enlisted as voters [take the case of Russia]?..so the future of Greece will not be decided in the parliament but in the roads .

like an ostrich

do you have an estimate of how many people are "in the roads" in Greece right now? how many of those "in the roads" are with KKE and how many with SYRIZA? any guess? for how long to behave like an ostrich comrade?

being ostrich is better than

being ostrich is better than parliamentary goosebumps
please explain the decrease of 6%
 

in these days of the currency

in these days of the currency of 21st century socialism eclecticism seems to be lauded as the example of 'new' 're-invented' thinking!

what u are viewing as

what u are viewing as 'eclecticism' may actually be non-sectarianism and greater tolerance towards plurality of opinions within the Left. this is indeed desirable given the eventual tragedies of 20th century socialism. 'new' and 're-invented' thinking is the need of the hour and not dogmatic adherence to 'vanguardism'.

The Stalinist KKE is losing

This is the latest opinion poll result from Greece - Latest opinion poll:

Syriza 30%; New Democracy 26%; Pasok 15%; Democratic Left 7%; Independent Greeks 7%; CP (KKE) 5%; Nazis 4.5%.