A Long & Arduous Struggle Ahead

22566_1191914683863_1408277385_30472497_2443187_n.jpg

The CPI(M) will undertake a comprehensive review of the results to identify the causes which have led to the erosion of support for the Left Front and the political shift that has taken place in West Bengal. The CPI (M) will, after the critical examination of the election results, orient itself towards taking up the issues of the basic classes and fighting for the interests of the working people. The political platform of the Left which includes the fight against the neo-liberal economic policies, defending the livelihood of the people, defence of national sovereignty and secularism remains as the only alternative political platform for the country as against those of the ruling class parties like the Congress and the BJP. General Secretary of the CPI(M), Prakash Karat writes. 

The elections to the West Bengal assembly have resulted in a big defeat for the Left Front. This has come as a major disappointment for the left, democratic and progressive forces in the country who consider West Bengal as a bastion of the Left. After 34 years of Left Front government and the remarkable record of winning seven successive elections since 1977, the CPI(M) led Left Front government has been voted out of office. Some general features of the verdict stand out. The people have decisively opted for change and given a sweeping victory to the TMC combine. There was a total consolidation of all the anti-Left forces ranging from the right to the Maoists on the extreme left. It is also evident that the Left Front could not recover the lost ground in the past two years as much as we expected.

Critical Review

The Party will undertake a comprehensive review of the results to identify the causes which have led to the erosion of support for the Left Front and the political shift that has taken place. Even though the Left Front has garnered an additional eleven lakh votes compared to the 2009 Lok Sabha polls, there is a reduction of 2.2 percentage points in the vote share compared to the Lok Sabha polls. Despite the solid achievements of the three decades of Left rule, the prolonged period in government led to the accumulation of some negative factors. The critical examination of the election trends placing it in the context of the political and organisational work of the Party should help us to chalk out the steps to be taken to rectify the flaws in our approach and remedy the organisational shortcomings.

In Kerala, the LDF lost narrowly falling short by three seats for a majority. The UDF managed to scrape through with a two seat majority. The difference between the UDF and LDF vote share is only 0.89 per cent. This shows that the people were by and large satisfied with the record of the LDF government and there was no anti-incumbency factor at work. The anti-corruption crusade of Chief Minister V.S.Achuthanandan also got popular endorsement. Preliminary reports show that a LDF victory was thwarted by the influence wielded by some caste and religious bodies over some sections of the people. A large number of people were not attracted to the Congress alliance given the record of corruption and price-rise under the UPA government at the Centre.

Motivated Attacks

The defeat in West Bengal has led to a barrage of propaganda in the corporate media against the CPI(M) and the Left. The results are being portrayed as a catastrophe from which the CPI(M) will not be able to recover. Another line of attack pursued by some commentators is to pronounce the ideology of the Communist Party as an anachronism and the verdict as a culmination of the end of the relevance of socialism and Marxism worldwide.

That these are patently false assertions can be understood by the fact that the fall of the Soviet Union had no material impact on the CPI(M). In fact, in the nineteen nineties, the Party grew and developed stronger, both in West Bengal and Kerala. As far as ideology is concerned, the CPI(M) draws on the theory and practice of Marxism by creatively applying it to Indian conditions. This is not a static position but one which evolves constantly.

The CPI(M) and the Left Front in West Bengal have grown and developed through innumerable struggles and popular movements stretching over four decades. The electoral success of the Left Front is an outcome of the mass base produced by such movements and struggles. The Left Front is not merely an electoral alliance nor has the CPI(M) grown and developed as a powerful mass party only due to its electoral activities.

Those who are writing the epitaph of the CPI (M) and the Left Front in West Bengal overlook the fact that even in this defeat the Left Front has polled forty one per cent of the votes. Over one crore ninety five lakh (19.5 million) people have voted and supported the Left Front. This is a substantial mass base which has withstood the attacks on the CPI (M) and the Left in the last two years and who constitute the class base of the working people. The virulent anti-communist and neo-liberal commentators will be proved wrong. The CPI (M) and the Left forces will conduct a patient struggle to win back those sections of the people who have been alienated by taking up their cause and fighting for them.

Another form of attack is to slander the entire record of the Left Front and to demonize the CPI (M) as an authoritarian force which has suppressed the people. Some have gone to the extent of claiming that the earlier victories of the Left Front are due to the repression of anyone who opposed or defied the CPI (M). These critics conveniently forget that in every assembly election since 1977, the anti-Left opposition has got not less than forty per cent of the vote at any time. The CPI (M) and the Left Front had a remarkable record of winning between forty five to fifty per cent of the votes in all previous elections owing to their deep roots among the people and the popular support that they commanded particularly in the rural areas. The vilification of the CPI (M) cadres painting them as despotic and corrupt is a motivated effort to disarm the Party as it is its dedicated and selfless cadres who are the backbone of the organisation.

An accompanying charge is that the Left Front government in West Bengal was inherently anti-democratic and a totalitarian set up which had stamped out all dissent and imposed a straitjacket on West Bengal society. The Left Front ruled through popular mandate by continuously subjecting itself to the democratic process under the parliamentary democratic system. The CPI(M) and the Left have shown that it is the most consistent force for democracy. Ever since the Communist Party won the elections in 1957 in Kerala and formed the first communist ministry in the country, it has vitalized democracy by bringing the vast masses into the democratic process. It is not accidental that the highest polling rates in the country are registered in West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura. It is in these three states that land reforms have broken the old landlord structure and expanded democracy. The panchayati institutions were vitalized. It is the agents of the dominant classes and vested interests who seek to tarnish and distort this democratic record of the Left.

Role of Left-led Governments

The CPI (M) had evolved its own approach to the running of state governments wherever it is able to get the support of the people. The Left-led governments have to be run in such a way as to strengthen the Left and democratic movement and the movement of the working people. The Party programme has spelt out that such governments should carry out a programme of providing relief to the people and to strive, project and implement alternative policies within the existing limitations. The unique record of the Left Front Government in West Bengal shows that it had seriously worked towards this goal. The loss of such a Left-led government is a setback but it cannot be seen as a permanent and fundamental loss. The CPI (M) has always stressed the importance of organizing the working people through their own class and mass organisations and developing popular movements and struggles and thereby raising the political consciousness of the people. The formation of the Left-led governments is an outcome of this process.

The CPI (M) will, after the critical examination of the election results, orient itself towards taking up the issues of the basic classes and fighting for the interests of the working people. The political platform of the Left which includes the fight against the neo-liberal economic policies, defending the livelihood of the people, defence of national sovereignty and secularism remains as the only alternative political platform for the country as against those of the ruling class parties like the Congress and the BJP.

In West Bengal, in the changed political situation, the CPI (M) will defend the gains achieved by the people over the last three decades under Left Front rule. Given the class nature of the ruling alliance, there will be efforts to undo the land reforms and undermine the gains achieved by the working people. We will defend the land reforms and the rights of the bargadars and agricultural workers; the workers will be better organized to fight for their rights and all sections of the working people in defence of their livelihood. The legacy of secularism and communal harmony has to be protected and the divisive forces out to disrupt the unity of the people and integrity of the state countered. All this will be accomplished by strengthening Left unity.

Defend Party & Left Front

In the aftermath of the elections, the immediate task is to defend the Party, the Left Front and the movement in West Bengal which has already come under attack. Soon after the election results, there have been scores of attacks on offices of the Party and trade unions. Murderous violence has been unleashed against the cadres and supporters of the CPI (M) and the Left Front. Within the first two days, two leaders of the CPI (M) were brutally killed. The Trinamul Congress wants to utilize the election victory to eliminate physically the CPI (M) and the Left in many areas. This has to be resisted and fought back. The democratic sentiments of the people in West Bengal have to be roused against such violence. The entire Party, the Left and democratic forces in the country stand steadfastly with the CPI (M) and the Left Front in West Bengal to rebuff such attacks.

 

3.19231
Average: 3.2 (26 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

Insist on Self Criticism

Com Prakash Karat's description of the CPI(M) task ahead as long and arduous is apt and wise .The CPI(M) should not rush into any hasty revision of its ideological , programmatic and tactical line or go in for wholesale change of leadership simply on the basis of the undoubtedly debilitating electoral defeat in West Bengal. The temptation would be high among sections of the party's well meaning middle class cadres and armchair academics to advocate a certain kind of ' leftism' as the answer to a certain kind of ' partyism' that according to me has played a role in organizational and political stagnation of the CPI(M) as a mass revolutionary party not just in West Bengal but elsewhere in the country. As the Chinese comrades are never tired of pointing out we should try to learn from facts . And learn as we go forward , trying not to make the same mistakes. We should theorize our own specific revolutionary experience both in the parliamentary and extra parliamentary struggles rather than try to fit our reality into some theory of revolution that seemingly offers solution to every problem that we face. A few practical suggestions on the critical review that Com Prakash has promised . 1) Let the friends of the party and the left democratic movement also contribute to the review in structured fashion that does not disrupt the organizational unity or help the class enemies to confuse and demoralize the party rank and file. 2)Insist on inner party self criticism by the leaders and leading cadres who have made mistakes and inform the larger democratic community of the thrust and tenor of their self criticism so that they have confidence in the party's capacity for rectification. Again, without sowing confusion among the party's supporters. I know this is armchair advice. But I am sure the party has the quality and the capability of turning this setback into an opportunity. N. Madhavan Kutty

@NM Kutty

can you please elaborate upon the category of "leftism" which you fear academics and armchair intellectuals are pushing for?

Leftism

'Leftism 'in the specific context in which we are discussing the road ahead for the CPI(M) means coming to see the party's parliamentary struggle as somehow subservient to extra parliamentary struggle.Demanding from party leaders and leading cadres a purist rather than simple life style in the name of rectification. Encouraging 'village idiocy' as Marx called it, in the name
of fighting primitive accumulation of finance capital. In a nutshell, the left sectarian tendency that gets strengthened in times of setback for the revolutionary movement which only further isolates the party from the people. Thanks.

NMK

@NMK

thanks for elaborating. it is indeed surprising that a self-professed sympathiser of the CPIM like you is taking such a position. have you read the CPIM CC document On Rectification Campaign adopted in October 2009: http://www.cpim.org/marxist/201001-rectification.pdf

nowhere does it talk about any malaise of "leftism" affecting the party. rather it points out the ills of "parliamentarism" (a reformist deviation), penetration of alien class values in the party, corruption, bureaucratism, etc. as the main trends to be fought against. are you challenging the understanding of this CC document? or under the garb of a Party sympathiser, are you one of "those"...

mass party?

"nor has the CPI(M) grown and developed as a powerful mass party only due to its electoral activities" is it not wrong to describe CPI(M) as a "mass party"? does it not dilute our ideological revolutionary understandings?

Need of Leading agitations in the country

CPIM should lead Anti-Nuclear Plant agitations in Jaitapur (Maharshtra), Haripura (West Bengal), Kowada (AP), Chaya Mirdhi Wadha(Gujrat) and Koodam kulam (TN). We should convert these struggles as Anti-imperialst struggles to Save Security and Pride of Indians.

CPI(M) has always tried to

CPI(M) has always tried to evolve - and has evolved in at least three Indian states - as a 'mass revolutionary party'. why should the concept of a mass party be juxtaposed with that of being a revolutionary party? in fact, 'revolutionism' in isolation from the masses can only lead to endless and meaningless guerilla warfare, like what the indian maoists are indulging in. that has nothing to do with revolutionary ideology and practise. a true revolution can only be made by masses.

Rectification , YES . Revolutionism , NO

Dear Comrades ,

Thanks for the spontaneous and sincere response to my warning against falling for any knee jerk "Leftism" on the face of the electoral setback in West Bengal. It is a little unfair to suspect that I might be a counterrevolutionary agent pretending to be a CPI(M) sympathizer. But I take Com Tirtha's. thought in my stride.

I have studied the party's Rectification document as best as I could and I fully endorse its diagnosis of what ails the party as primarily 'parliamenterism' which expresses itself as total preoccupation with elections to the neglect of extra parliamentary struggles, the factional strife for positions of power at various levels both in the party and in capitalist government , personality cult , corruption and bureaucratization of the party. The party has correctly identified this as the principal deviation in West Bengal party leading to the string of electoral defeats. This is also true of the Kerala unit but under different circumstances. But it is precisely at this moment of rectification of a certain error that its opposite emerges unnoticed. I am no great fan of Stalin but there is something to learn from him here . Once he was asked which is the more dangerous deviation facing the Soviet Party at the moment , Right or Left wing deviation ? Stalin said "Which ever deviation you neglect to fight at the moment".

Comrades , the shrill cries from a section of venerable party veterans and think tanks who never had to dirty their hands in either parliamentary or extra parliamentary struggles in the recent moments of crises that all seems lost in West Bengal had prompted me to openly come out in support of Com Prakas Karat's sane call of patient critical review of the results.
To be nostalgic about some non existent golden past of the Communist movement is not the way to go about meeting the present challenges. Realism is not a dirty word for Communists . We practice it all time , in battles and in power . What we should shun is opportunism ie .saying things very radical and not putting them into practice, both as a party and as responsible individuals supportingthe party . To be realistic is to seeking truth from facts . To learn what the masses really demand than what we think they should demand at a particular point .There was no earthly chance of the party developing parliamentary deviation in a state like Madhya Pradesh or Maharashtra where power was never on offer for our party leaders. Yet if we continue to stagnate in these regions what could be the reason ?Factional strife and personality cult born of parliamentary ambitions has not prevented the CPI(M) in Kerala from doing well in the Assembly polls in 2006 and 2011.

Now despite the bad result , the party has polled a little more than 41 per cent of the votes in West Bengal. It has around 48 per cent vote share in Kerala and almost half the vote share in Tripura. This is no time for doomsday scenarios. Yes the party needs to change but change organically, maintaining continuity with change. That was how it had overcome more severe setbacks in the past both in the parliamentary and extra parliamentary struggles. If you don't historicize the present moment you will behave like novices ending up with a CPI(M) which is neither a mass party nor a revolutionary one.Like one one of those small but beautiful Trotskyist , Maoist , Stalinist groups and formations that you meet so often in the cyber world and elite Marxist academic journals.

One last word . Sorry I am not able to understand a CPI(M) well wisher who has problems with his party seeing itself as a mass revolutionary party, a concept that was the outcome of the Salkia plenum. If someone sees a contradiction in this concept , I have no answer. The party may have failed to live up to the concept in every detail but that is how it has grown since the split in 1963-64 iand that is how it should expand and grow if it were to lead the Indian Working Class. I say this not because of any love of words .But the concept embodies the past , the present and the future of the Indian Road to Socialism championed by the CPI(M) . It what makes the party the only original among a plethora of fakes , parties , pundits, wind bagging groups and armed bandits who claim to be Communist revolutionaries. That is why I have come to support it.

Fraternally
N. Madhavan Kutty

comrade nmk, my problem with

comrade nmk, my problem with your present intervention, and indeed other interventions in the past, arises out of your disproportionate zeal in attacking some perceived "leftism" of marxist intellectuals and academics, while remaining totally silent about many other ills plaguing the left movement. in terms of stalin's dictum - you are fighting "left" deviations all the time while trying to shove "right" deviations under the carpet. what conclusions can one draw from this?

moreover, while criticisms of the movement or the party are often made in ideological-political terms, your attack against intellectuals and party veterans invariably takes the shape of personal attacks - for instance: "the shrill cries from a section of venerable party veterans and think tanks who never had to dirty their hands in either parliamentary or extra parliamentary struggles". how much of your hand has been dirtied by any struggle whatsoever, nobody knows?? who are you to pass judgements about what comprises a "shrill" cry? your endless rants against intellectuals, if anything, are shriller and more intemperate than anything else that is on offer.

so please don't preach all the time without contributing anything original. and do not be under any illusion that prakash karat is so isolated in this forum that you are left alone to defend him. leave the job of arbitrating on "left" and "right" deviations to the polit bureau of the party. do not pose as if that role has been assigned to you.

Come Clean Comrade

Dear Com Thirtha,

I am not trying to find out who you are . Nor am asking for your credentials to attribute to me all kinds of things including anti - intellectualism , 'shoving right deviation under the carpet' just because you find my tone to be preachy and imagine that I am targeting some of your holy cows . Ok .I am not commenting in good faith . .But does it not occur to you even for a moment that you may also need to exorcise some ghosts of your own before we get down to some decent conversation or political polemics worthy of the friends of the CPI(M) . Perhaps the problem comrade , is that we don't know each other well enough. Or could it be that you know me and my views well enough?

Whatever be it , since I am not for shadow boxing or for continuing this exchange in the vein you have set , be reassured on the following facts before we apply the closure .My name is N. Madhavan Kutty . I am a a journalist who works for the CPI(M) in my state of Kerala to the best of my ability. I am not a party member . But I do dirty my hands and brains for the party once in a while in its daily battles against its enemies. I am sixty one years old and wise enough to understand my own limitations and sane enough not to arrogate to myself any role in defending any leader in my party, least of all its General Secretary . Of course , I have come to know Pragoti much more recently . But I think know the CPI(M) at some close quarters through the years and I am not that stupid to be preaching to the party through Pragoti which is the role given to political operators and not of any self respecting party supporter . And Pragoti is certainly not my only forum for expression. I thought I was addressing through Pragoti the friends of the CPI(M) . I am sure I am still not wrong though Pragoti members may include a few who see themselves as the party's conscience keepers or the cult followers of some guru or lineage .

Sorry , I find your repeated demand that I be original in my comments unacceptable . I am not up to it . But from when have we , supporters of a working class party started demanding this from one another ? Don't you feel that it is utterly unfair for a progressive democratic platform like Pragoti that we subject comments from members to some kind of peer review or originality test. And original in what? In theory ? Are Pragoti members supposed to be defending doctoral theses every time they make a comment. And do you mean to suggest that every comment and every piece that has appeared on Pragoti to date other than mine has been original ? How are we different from closed incestuous elitist anti - CPI(M) platforms like Kofeila or Fourth Estate if we set such standards for discussion ? I hope you will at least agree that the Pragoti Editorial team is politically competent to avoid any substandard stuff and unfamiliar vocabulary.

Fraternally

NMK

com nmk, i am tirtha and a

com nmk, i am tirtha and a student of economics in JNU. the people i am trying to defend against your attacks are not 'holy cows' but marxist intellectuals of some repute. from my point of view i think their arguments and critique, which they have been making for quite a few years now, are correct and have been validated over time. that is making you desperate and you have started hurling abuses at them. you may be associated with the cpim. but your attitude towards marxist intellectuals show that you are yet to learn the basics of cpim. you seem to be deeply affected by factional prejudices. rather than making lengthy posts attacking marxist intellectuals and party veterans in a forum like pragoti like a political operator, please try to write original pieces like a party intellectual and put forward your views through them. i'm sure you will get much more respect for such endeavours.

Thanks

My Dear Tirtha,
Thanks for finally revealing your identity and for your continued attention .I did not know you were shadowing me like this for so long . Again I am not asking you to name the Marxist intellectuals you claim to defend from my alleged attacks. Whoever they be , they need stronger defense than the one you offer if at all they feel I am making cowardly attacks on them
through Pragoti. Please ask any one of them . I am sure they would instruct you to either ignore my comments or come up with something by way of political argument than personal abuse. If what I am saying against " Leftism " is factional , then you are also guilty of the same by getting emotionally worked up on the subject. If I am a political operator you have still to prove your not one. By the way , since I am not privy to CPI(M) or JNU secrets please clarify the factionalism that you have introduced into this discussion.Since you have tried to come clean , kindly come clean fully so that we can be friends and not factional foes. But take pity on this old scare crow . I can not be original even if I try my best . Make some lesser demand so that we remain friends.Or do you have only friends who are original Marxist intellectuals of long standing.

Love and All the Best
NMK

Unnecessarily personal

Dear Tirtha, NMK,

While an open and wholehearted debate on the reasons/implications/ normative suggestions of/for the Left following the elections is a must, please try to keep the debate non-personal. This is not a comment directly on your postings, but a general one as the debate otherwise can be taken into unnecessary directions without resolution and would require to be moderated, something that we as moderators are very distressed to do. 

Thanks.