It is interesting to see an article on Pragoti after a long time that has attracted laborious and critical comment. But it is surprising to see the intensely personal attacks and epithets. The writer has obviously aggravated the 'thought police' among the avant garde CPI(M) intellectuals.
But beyond the passionate personal attacks looms a larger question. As far as I know, the CPI)M) was born rejecting the 'national bourgeoisie' thesis. So why this passionate plea by the Young Turks to look at the Russian ruling class as a 'strategic ally'?
It is interesting to see an
It is interesting to see an article on Pragoti after a long time that has attracted laborious and critical comment. But it is surprising to see the intensely personal attacks and epithets. The writer has obviously aggravated the 'thought police' among the avant garde CPI(M) intellectuals.
But beyond the passionate personal attacks looms a larger question. As far as I know, the CPI)M) was born rejecting the 'national bourgeoisie' thesis. So why this passionate plea by the Young Turks to look at the Russian ruling class as a 'strategic ally'?