The initiative taken by the SFI-JNU to bring five Left political organizations on the same platform is an impressive one. For the renewal of the progressive and democratic movement, it is important that the forces working for social and political change work together closely. It is envisaged that this platform will remain committed to such unity and participate in united struggles for peoples’ livelihood, freedom from exploitation and oppression, dignity and social justice.
The radical slogan of the French Revolution “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity” is aptly relevant to our times. The need for a comprehensive and principled struggle against multiple forms of unjustified inequalities necessitated the need that struggling masses of different nomenclature should unite. Fraternity as the basic principle of revolutionary change gives an élan for a unity of the fighting masses towards achieving certain common revolutionary ideals. However, in India, the separate and independent democratization of the oppressed and the marginalized groups for their exclusive interests have blunted the revolutionary force to bring substantive changes within the current system. The possibilities that these groups can come together to launch a relentless struggle against the varied forms of oppression and exploitation is an unexplored idea.
The majority of our people in India today are facing the onslaught of the pro-rich policies of economic liberalization. The rampant corruption, growing unemployment, Inflation, price hikes and the open loot of our natural resources in the hands of corporate mafia has created a hopeless situation for the common man. The Dalits and the Tribals in addition suffered a double onslaught as they also face violent attacks, humiliation, and social oppression as unwanted people by the social elites and their political masters. Identically, the majority of the Muslims are also economically and educationally backward and simultaneously remain under the hegemonic threat of majoritarian communalism. The Right wing Hindutva politics has created an atmosphere of fear and antagonism against the Muslim minority. Further, the recent events have once again highlighted that that the social conditions of the women in India have degraded significantly and regressive patriarchal values continue to dominate society.
The poor, the Dalits, the Tribals, the Muslims and the Women are the categories which can be identified as the worse off sections of our society. The ruling ideas of neo-liberal capitalist economy and the oppressive-brahmanical social ideology - in alliance - are responsible for their sufferings and inhuman living conditions. The oppressed communities are combating the exploitative social and economic order on the ground, but their struggles in most places are local, small and constrained by the exclusive political ethics of the given territorial space. The Dalit movements in Maharashtra and Tamilnadu, the Tribal struggles in Odisha and Chattisgarh, the fight against communalism by the Muslims in Gujarat and Mumbai, the struggle for women’s rights in Delhi, at their respective stages have showcased the apathy of the ruling classes over their issues and has also challenged the state. However, these varied agencies of social change has no centre where they can meet and form unified struggle to challenge the authorities for a comprehensive social and economic change. Therefore there is a need to combine all forms of Left, democratic, progressive struggles and movements for ushering in radical change and empowering the deprived masses.
To visualize a possibility in which the varied democratic and progressive movements fighting for a just cause can build a common platform, is a revolutionary exercise. A united front of the fighting people with a constructive socio-political and economic agenda can radicalize the current depressing order. A principled agreement in between the oppressed sections over the possible organizational method, leadership and political demands to form such a united front, will not only bring the fighting people together but will also churn a new political ideology for a radical socio-economic change.
However, in this churning the most important aspect is to build consensus over crucial principles on which the struggling masses must agree and be ready to struggle. In this respect, the initiative taken by the SFI-JNU to bring five Left political organizations on the same platform is an impressive one. For the renewal of the progressive and democratic movement, it is important that the forces working for social and political change work together closely. It is envisaged that this platform will remain committed to such unity and participate in united struggles for peoples’ livelihood, freedom from exploitation and oppression, dignity and social justice.
These Left political organisations have identified five crucial political objectives over which the struggling people can build a consensus and forge a comprehensive unity. First, constitutional democracy in India needs to be restructured by making it more pro-people and welfarist in nature. The greater aim should be to build a substantive democracy and genuine federalism. The current regime has been hijacked by the rich and the corrupt. Out of the 543 elected MPs in the Loksabha today, 315 have personal wealth of over 1 crore rupees and 76 have serious criminal charges like murder, kidnapping and robbery pending against them. The situation is similar in state assemblies and even the local bodies. Also, the overarching power of the Union disrespects the federal character of the polity. To liberate the polity from the excessive control of the rich and the mafia and to ensure proper accountability of the legislature, the judiciary and the executive, radical electoral and administrative reforms must be sought.
People must demand for more decentralised Institutions and greater autonomous participation by the the local and regional groups in decision making. The Institutions must also be structured in respect to the varied social and religious diversities to make it more participatory and representative in nature. Democracy with an agenda of substantive participation of deprived and oppressed groups as the mainstream force will ensure a radical departure from the current order.
Second objective is to work for a transition from the current profit-centric neo-liberal economy dominated by big monopolies towards a socialist framework of welfare economy. The neoliberal economic regime based on reckless exploitation of labour and the loot of natural resources by foreign and domestic corporate capital must cease to operate. Instead struggles should be waged for people-centric planned economic development. Economic planning must ensure social equity, should secure the rights of workers and peasants and should be based on environmental sustainability. The fighting people must realize that the empowerment of the toiling masses can be ensured only within a socialist framework.
Third, Secularism and Social Justice should be the principle directives of the movements. The concerns and the interests of the oppressed and deprived identities must find equal space in the programmatic arrangement of the envisaged platform. Our familial relations are marked by discrimination against women and patriarchal values. Caste oppression, atrocities and humiliation against Dalits and visible marginalization and exploitation of Tribals is the norm of our social system. Therefore, fighting for social justice, dignity and empowerment of these deprived groups should become a necessary parameter to judge the practice of transformative politics. It can be ensured by demanding effective affirmative action, including reservations, for all socially disadvantaged sections who have historically suffered from discrimination. Equally important is to safeguard the secular character of the Indian state and combating communalism. Religious minorities, especially Muslims are the worst sufferers of the communal-fascistic propaganda. The common platform of struggling people must ensure that while all religions enjoy equal freedom and respect, the affairs of the state must remain free from the interference of any religion. The state must also ensure protection of the rights of religious minorities against majoritarian politics.
Finally, the unified movement of the struggling masses should not restrict to the sovereign national territory but must also expand its voices to protect and promote the interests of other fighting groups in other parts of the world. Hence, building solidarity with progressive and democratic forces across the world – especially the developing countries – against imperialism, militarism and neo-liberalism is the need of our times. The vision is to evolve a global platform of oppressed groups that struggles for global peace and a democratic world order, free of wars and nuclear weapons.
A vibrant participative democracy, governance based on the ethical values of secularism and social justice and a socialist outlook towards economy and international relations are the three vital aspects for a just polity. These ideals promise the end of unjustified inequalities and envisage a world based on individual liberty, politico-economic equality and social harmony. In today’s context, bringing these ideals together for a comprehensive struggle for justice is a revolutionary task. Equally important is to mobilize all the struggling and fighting people to achieve the unfinished agenda of social revolution.
(Author is a member of the Left Collective, Delhi)
Comments
What is new?
Pragoti has been trying to show ever since Prasenjith Bose has submitted resignation of a new Political model (supposed to be of Latin America or Syriza model) and also condemnation of Democratic Centralism. Its highly appreciable that broad left & democratic front forging is being told, but then what is new here? What is new from what CPI(M) has been trying to build the Left & Democratic Alternative and a longer term People's Democratic Front which would spearhead the PDR? Apart from pure rhetoric there is neither nothing new (as they are supposed to be showing) nor anything substantiative apart from words like more federalism, restructuring of constitutional democracy... CPI(M) has submitted their opinions of proprotional representtaive democracy and how a people's democratic state would be, also on the federalism. So what is new here?
But a Communist Party supposed to be the vanguard of working class - there is no valid or logical point how democratic centralism has become invalid or failed! what all had been mentioned had been the problems, there was no dialectic approach to investigate whether because of these problems this cocnept itself is absurd or how those problems can be addresses. Not a mention abt the external conditions, the string and wide control of Imperialism on every aspect of society including the minds of even teh rural people. Broad front is required for broader goals, but for specific goals of class struggle, to guide till sopcialist revolution, Democratic Centralism is the base without which enemy wille asily disunite and sp[read chaos among people!
And there is no suprise because of the broad goals - this article doesnt use the terms "land lords", "big -bourgeosie", "imperialists". And even no mention about working class, poor & middle peasantry, agricultural worklers and other marginalized sections.
if really this initiative want to broaden the left & democratic front, why cant join the existing and make it more broader!!
I find a big sectarian approach here, my request if your intentions are genuine & honest, pls dont take sectarian stands, join and strengthen the existing Left & Democratic Front led by CPI(M), CPI, RSP, FB
beating around the bush..
The commenter above has not followed the debates that have happened in this very site - pragoti.in , where the same kind of arguments peddled by status quoists against critics of the current politics of the left have been well answered and responded to. The response is reposted here -
http://www.pragoti.in/node/4784
All the arguments vis-a-vis the problems and misguided principles in the Left today; the need for unity of genuine democratic, progressive and leftist forces; the lessons learnt from successes of the left forces elsewhere in the world - and dialectically, from the failures/ stagnancy of the "orthodox socialist forces" of the past century are all explained and detailed in the above article.
The need for left unity despite significant programmatic differences through a platform approach that is democratic and based on joint struggles and united praxis is also touched upon - and that is precisely what the new initiative launched in the JNU has started and envisaged - an effort that must be appreciated and engaged with. "Vanguardism" and "my party is the best"- attitude will lead one nowhere.
What is New?
The same link was more of rhetoric. On Democratic Centralism - CPI(M) GS had written a piece on Marxists arguing against all the quotations mentioned there, there was no answer which means, there was no new or thought proviking thing, there is no logical explaination still why DC is irrelevant today (and the relevance was stressed by the GS). The possibilities thrown by the so called structural changes was nothing but copy from the Ideological Resolution of CPI(M) and few rhetoric....
Unconvincing
The CPI(M) GS's views on democratic centralism are unconvincing, the CPI(M)'s praxis has not reached a stage, where one can say they have made progress (at a pretty opportune moment). It is the innovative Left forces from elsewhere who have shown the path for left and progressive forces' unity, capturing public imagination and rallying around the basic classes in the fight against exploitation, neoliberalism, imperialism and for social justice. The CPI(M) has managed, through its historical trajectory, bring millions of adherents to its praxis and its call for a people's democratic revolution, but at the same time, committed such monumental blunders and has repeated them that it has lost the confidence of many an adherent as well has precluded those who have to be their base from supporting and adhering to them wholeheartedly.
All this is plain evident to those who have eyes and ears and are willing to be self-critical, except the same old naysayers and pooh-poohers who are happy with the status quo. The earlier linked article by a commenter, comprehensively shows up as to how the practice of "Democratic Centralism" has degenerated organisationally and has subverted genuine democratic norms. That does not mean that any organisation that professes democratic centralism cannot be part of a revolutionary praxis, which can and must be brought out by joint praxis and engagement in joint struggle led by various left and progressive forces.
It is also sad that any new initiative from any section of the Left that is not exclusive led by the CPI(M) is seen as hostile by some of the status quoists. I would urge them to have a more open mind.
Reply to Unconvincing
The points mentioned in that Pragoti post quoting Aniket Alam, Prabhat Patnaik etc. has been given proper reply by Party GS in the following article - http://www.cpim.org/marxist/201001-Democratic-Centralism-Prakash.pdf
There was no logical arguments in pragoti to any of these explainations by Party GS.
It is like some people saying because errors occured in Socialisonstruction, Socialism itself is a failure, because there are problems in implementing DC, the concept itself is a failure.
Second, the word "new initiative" itself seems to be sectarian, because if the cause is really genuine, the so called initiative should have been to broaden the existing Left & Democratic Front. CPI(M) also mentions in its party congress PR, not any hegemony for party but for broader Left & Democratic Fronts. The thrust is to unify all people's struggles (those of workers, peasants and other marginalized sections) against the imperialists, landlords, big bougeosie.
And we want broader fronts for broader goals.. but fopr specific goals of PDR or SR, we need a disciplined "Communist Party" with DC. Apart from that its an absurd assumption that those who are criticising your arguments are being hostile - thats intolerance towards criticisms which looks like undemocratic...I feel and all people who wants a change in system wants all like minded people to be together not separate.
please take a look at the
please take a look at the recent activities of your "disciplined" communist party in the recent times: trying to establish an SEZ by taking over farmlands and firing on peasants in nandigram, cutting deals with the Congress to pass the nuclear deal while opposing it in public, killing left leaders like TP Chandrashekaran in Kerala, supporting Congressman Pranab Mukherjee in the presidential elections, trying to fight FDI in retail joining hands with Mulayam Singh and getting fooled in the process and now openly batting for SEZ status to Infosys and Wipro in West Bengal...
"Democratic Centralism" ensures that such activities and the leaders who promote them continues to hold their positions and stall any attempt at rectification. Got the Point?
Stop the blah blah blah..about Prabhat Patnaik, Prakash Karat, V.I Lenin etc. etc..
New social revolution..??
Here come replies from the most open minded, self-critical, non status quoists, genuine revolutionaries bashing and using some fancy and sarcastic words (whose meanings could be found in urban dictionaries only if people like me searches for their meanings) people who dare to disagree with their political and organisational line.
Anyway, the whole point is about the intentions. A group of current and former activists have suddenly started seeing every anti Left Front, mainly CPI (M) person or organisation as genuine revolutionaries after its decision to support Pranab Mukherjee for presidential candidate. If at all this group of individuals is honest in achieving what they have endorsed in their appeal released on Pragoti after their meeting on 13 January and claim to work for social transformation and presenting political alternative at the national level would they care to reply how are they going to achieve these and other objectives mentioned in their appeal? If their answer is that they are going to do it by building mass struggles at grass root levels and forming a broad left and progressive platform then how is it different from what CPI(M) and other left parties are trying to do? Which are these forces and organisations (other than who attended this meeting) with whom these genuine revolutionaries will co-operate in future to strengthen unity of progressive and left forces? Will the organisers of this meeting tell masses from where they have excavated these real and genuine leftists who shared the dais that day and about their political credentials?
Did the organisers forget to invite their revolutionary counterparts such as AISA and AISF or these organisations didn't show any interest as most of the students of that campus in this new left formation?
Shamsher Singh
Is the CPI(M) really trying
Is the CPI(M) really trying to build a left and democratic alternative? where...? how...?
why aren't more forces joining the efforts of the CPI(M)? if the author of this article is sectarian, are all others in the country being sectarian too?
please introspect. that is the least that is expected of the CPI(M). the lack of self-criticism and the continuing self-righteousness of the CPI(M) is really appalling.
what new in new,
every body knows that cpim has been become a saviour of congress, industrialist are bailed out by congress and congress is bailed out by cpim(whenever congress required no in parliament cpim comes forward and help them out) we have already been seen cpim double standard in president fiasco. if cpim consider itself supporting pranab mukerjee for president. it was correct stand. he was the main architecture of nuclear deal and responsibe for neo liberal policies . so why they expelled mr chatterji. how cpim can expelling chatterji was correct step. there are some people in cpim they are the member of polit bureo and cc they are having close nexus with congress. i belong to uttar pradersh and i live here i sought that cpim ,citu member are killed by sp in up. and bihar by lalu. they r sitting with them. sharing dias, cpim. every one know mr sarkar was erstwhile mla of cpim from bihar he was killed by sahabuddin. next day mr harkishan surjit was canvassing with lalu how rediculos they r claiming we are communist. they think lalu and mulayam are most honest and liberal and secular . therefore there base have been shrunk to nill. in up and bihar. if cpim belongs to maxism and leninsm so what they are doing with these corrupt n communal parties.