Unarguably, Israeli regime is a blood-thirsty, irrational and illegal regime. Humanity stands offended by the very existence of this Israeli establishment.
We strongly condemn the brutal genocide of innocent civilians aboard aid-carrying ships (dubbed as Freedom Flotilla) to Gaza by the Israeli military. This comes as another instance of the absolutely inhuman character of the Israeli regime and its overt supporters, US imperialism. The Israeli project of militarily cleansing the occupied nation of Palestine, through its numerous and indiscriminate massacres of Arab-Palestinians, has not only seriously compromised international laws but also, ironically, demonstrated its own version of fascism. The attack on this independent group, which had many internationally renowned activists, journalists and concerned citizenry of the world, that too in international waters, is heinous and shows no respect for any democracy and basic human values. That the survivors were abducted and illegally confined under military control defies all logic and actively ridicules the most fundamental tenets of international and human justice. Unarguably, it is a regime which is blood-thirsty, irrational and illegal. Humanity stands offended by the very existence of this Israeli establishment.
The Israeli military, backed by the American imperial interests, have been indulged in a completely illegal and ruthless colonisation of Palestine since May 14, 1948. The international community has consistently failed in restraining Israel which has allowed it to continue killing innocent Palestinians including small children and women; and bombing places like schools and hospitals. The year 1967 marked a gory black chapter in the history of humanity, when Gaza strip and West Bank were carpet bombed and resulted into death and displacement of more than 3 lakh Palestinians. Those who stayed are refugees in their own land. Various “peace” processes have aggravated the pain of Palestinians and Israel has comfortably run its terror machinery with US backing.
Gaza strip is a 360 square kilometer piece of land with around 1.5 million people and constitutes one of the last frontiers that Israel wants to capture to complete the colonisation of Palestine which has gone unhindered for last 60 years. Israel has been using all possible oppressive tactics in Gaza; when Hamas made military takeover infeasible, the all-out racist and fascist regime began the physical-economic blockade. Throughout the last 60 years of the Palestinian struggle and “peace” travesties, Israel has been bombing and starving the Arab-Palestinians at its own will and overarching impunity.
During the last attack on Gaza in January 2009, the United States had come in full support of the Israeli operation and had even tried to block a resolution against it in the UN Security Council. It should be remembered that around 1 crore Arab-Muslims, the original inhabitants of the Palestinian nation, are now leading a life of fear, despair and absolute poverty in West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Syria and other Arab countries; forcefully thrown out from their own lands. As A. G. Noorani said in one of his articles, “Their plight is tragic beyond words”. The current crisis started with Israel breaking the ceasefire with the democratically elected Hamas government. However, even during the ceasefire Gaza was completely blockaded by Israel and any supply of vital necessities of life like paper, ink, books, medical supplies and food supplies was disrupted leaving the people to starve and die. The blockade continues unabated for three years now without any significant intervention by international community and especially by the UNSC.
Domestically, the Indian government, in pursual of its pro-U.S. foreign policy, has given a silent burial to the Nehruvian consensus of standing for peace, justice and non-alignment in the world. With the Indian ruling class in firm alliance with the hegemonic interests and aspirations of the U.S., there is a need to reinstate the slogans of the Indian freedom struggle and pressurise the government to adopt an independent foreign policy in support of Palestine and other oppressed people in the world. With the ‘shining India’ willing to become part of the Islamophobic ‘axis of democracy’ led by the US; Indian government has entered into strategic military alliance with Israel. It is clear that aligning more with the U.S. and Israel would bring in more disasters for India as well as the world. The way to mutual co-existence and peace in the international arena lies in opposing the war-mongers and oppressors both internally and externally.
It should be clear to all that for a long-lasting atmosphere of peace and mutual trust in the world and for effective control of the "menace" of terrorism, it is imperative to deliver justice to the Palestinian nation and its people. It is not only the moral responsibility of the world but also essential for the survival of the core principles of human life as well as humanity itself. No negotiations for settlement of the Palestinian problem are possible with the terrorist state of Israel. It is high time we return to the basics of the violent and unjust creation of the state of Israel, a white-Jewish state, which was forced through a war on a majority Muslim nation. The inevitable resistance in Palestine concerned a dignified Palestinian nationhood. It was never an “Islamic” terrorist movement. Those who still argue for the “peaceful” two-state formula or pre-1967 status-quo should know that until the foundational injustice in the whole existence of Israel is not addressed, long-term peace cannot be established in the region as well as the world. History has taught us that injustice and peace have never gone together.
Comments
This is mindless antisemitism
I am shocked and awed by the violence and bigotry of the author's words. Reading such mindless and unreflected rhetoric of hatred makes my faith in Progress and the Left suffer, every time.
I will be very clear about three things. (1) The situation in the West Bank, and especially in Gaza, is unjust, shocking, undeserved, and in need of remedy. (2) The Israeli state has acted unwisely, cruelly and unjustly in many cases and has committed countless crimes against the Palestinians; it has done so again in this instance. (3) The "freedom flotilla" was a brave symbolic act to put the tragedy of the Palestinians back onto the map. But it was foolhardy, and the motives of many on board were not pure -- yes, there was a significant contingent of militant Islamists on board (read any reliable news source), who did use lethal violence against the Israeli teams. It wasn't exactly Satyagraha, dear Awanish!
But. Anyone who writes that "the foundational injustice in the whole existence of Israel" needs to be "adressed" is obviously in need of some history education. I cannot understand how someone writing in a decidedly Progressive forum can deny the right of the Jewish people (who were nearly extinct in the Holocaust by fascists, driven from Europe, and then settled here by the British and French), or any people for that matter, to live in that part of the world and to have a state in which to do so. That does not contradict the right of the Palestinians to a viable state! It means a compromise, not a conflict must be fostered.
Being for Progress and Peace means seeking to settle conflicts and create institutions which foster truly free co-operation among people. It does not mean denying people the right to a state or to their entire existence. If the author indeed is advocating the removal of the people of Israel from that part of the world ("drive them into the sea", as Ahmadinejad would say), then this author is a pathological antisemite, a fascist. At least the author should be honest about this ideaology and not pose as a progressive and peaceful person.
Not a Terrorist?
While thanking "anonymous" for not branding me a "terrorist", I would like to respond to the charges put forward.
First, let us begin with the inherent irony in the three "clear" things. The situation in West Bank and Gaza needs "remedy". And the Israeli state has acted "unwisely" (as against wise injustice), many a times. Freedom Flotilla was at the same time a "foolhardy attempt" as well as a "significant contingent" of "militant" Islamists (the good old blanket term) with lethal weapons who used violence against Israeli army! One can only hear the eyewitness accounts of many survivors from Indonesia, Pakistan and other countries (mostly journalists and political activists themselves) who have unequivocally maintained that Israeli army killed people on board in cold blood. Further, according to the own admission of Israeli establishment, the lethal weapons were mostly construction materials. In many respects, if that comparison has to be made, it actually resembled a Satyagraha.
Secondly, Anonymous believes that if I receive some history education at a good school (would the RSS-run Saraswati Shishu Mandir do?), I would be enlightened enough to NOT see the "foundational injustice" in the "birth and existence" of Israel. But how? In fact, this assertion reinforces my point that, with enough propaganda, the most basic historical truths about Israel-Palestine conflict have been compromised.
Thirdly, look at the ridiculous contradiction in this statement: How can Jews "who were nearly extinct in the Holocaust by fascists, driven from Europe, and then SETTLED HERE by BRITISH and FRENCH", be denied their rights? I dont see the worth of responding to this.
Fourthly, Another one: "How can ANY "PEOPLE", for that matter, be denied the right to live in THAT part of the world and to have a STATE in which to do so? Again!
Fifthly, like a true and experienced apologist, after this we arrive at the amicable parts of the arguments. That is, the fact that the Jews were settled in Palestine by Imperialists; with disproportionate use of brutal force and open terrorism without following the universally accepted democratic right of "self determination" of nations and which resulted into mass killings and migration of innocent Palestinians; does not contradict the right of the Palestinians to a VIABLE state! And hence, a compromise must be fostered. Since the Imperial will is supreme and it has been actualised, lets not create a conflict. It always looks good if the oppressed and the oppressor compromise.
Finally, "Being for progress and peace (?) means seeking to settle conflicts and create institutions which foster truly "free" co-operation among people". So, you know, to dream about compromise and co-operation, let us also assume that both Israelis and Palestinians are negotiating in an institutional framework which enables truly free co-operation among people. And, as a corollary, Gazans are also free.
P.S.- I have never said, in the article, that Israel be "removed" from "that part" of the world. By reminding the fundamental basis of a conflict and asking for a urgent solution does not constitute anti-semitism. I am not a Gandhian, but you must read Gandhi on Palestine for a perspective from the apostle of "non-violence". As I have said, until the core injustice is addressed, there cannot be any peace anywhere in the world. Further, the comparison with Ahmadinejad by Anonymous, itself, is meant to convey a lot. I wonder, why I am still not branded a terrorist?
Amazing..
..how a single sentence by the author could be twisted to call the person "anti-semitic". This is the standard line taken by Zionists when anyone protests the oppression writ large on the Palestinians by the Isreali state (and sadly society).
The foundational basis of a Jewish state by trudging upon the rights of the Palestinians remains and continues to remain unjust. No one is opposed to Jews and Arabs staying together, but by trampling the latter and squeezing their existence into ghettos and by progressively undermining their habitats through settlements, through gross violation of every international norm, through aggrandisement and now the blockade, the Israeli state has proven to be most criminal. To say this aloud does not make an anti-semite. That is nonsense.
Was Mahatma Gandhi an anti-semite?
"The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine."
This line was written by none other than Mahatma Gandhi. Was he also an anti-semite? To say so would be simply foolish.
Gandhi's article on Palestine can be found here.
On Israel-palestine conflict
The Israel- Palestine conflict has to be seen in a correct historical perspective, which at times the academia and media tend to ignore for obvious reasons. While nobody disputes the Holocaust and the oppression of Jews by Fascists, it has also to be seen how and where the state of Israel was carved out on Biblical notions amidst Arab- Muslim population by imperialist powers, its immediate recognition and support by them, and how the state has conducted itself over the years since 1948- the growth and expansion of right-wing governments there, militarization in the name of “defence”, continued expansion of its territory through repeated wars, from a position of negotiation with Palestine to almost dictation of terms to it and finally unjust occupation and blockade, showing a deaf-ear to international law and agencies, and attacks on humanitarian efforts as well. The list is long. Also, it’s quite ironical how a critique of ‘Israel or Jews’ can amount to being “anti-semitical”! Saqib.
"Anonymous" replies to the discussion
Here is "anonymous" from above, again. Sorry, the site has no way of adding a name (I guess, unless you are a registered user). My name is Phil. Thank you, Awanish, for responding, and for at least partially taking my comments seriously. The sarcastic lower ("thirdly..." onwards) part I will ignore, it doen't look like a serious engagement. In any case I am happy to see that my comment provoked discussion, but also a bit surprised by the vehemence of some of the attacks. Please, Awanish, also do me one favour and in future "quote" me without changes or added CAPITALISATIONS, it's only fair, and better style. Basically, only quote what I actually wrote.
A terrorist is defined by his means, not his motivations. Therefore I would never call you a terrorist on the basis of your argumentation. But by that definition, people who shoot rockets (out of whatever noble cause) at civilians to inspire fear indeed are terrorists in my book. Anyone who uses violence to create fear and influence politics is a terrorist. Yes, some Israeli politicians may even be called terrorists.
But on the question of how the Israeli army killed and how it was attacked, the jury is still out. There are a lot of "eyewitness" and other reports currently out there. According those I read, the army attacked first with paintball guns, and responded with lethal fire only when some soldiers were captured and being beaten (possibly to death) with metal poles and other devices. A steel pole definitely is both a construction material and a lethal weapon. I would still agree that responding with firearms is unproportional. However: Satyagraha it most definitely was not! Nonviolent resistance is simply that: non. violent. resistance. ... not resistance with less-powerful weapons than the opponent's. That was my point about Gandhi. What Gandhi may have had to say about Palestine is a different matter, even though he was probably not an expert on the subject.
Criticising Israel is not ant-semitism. I have not said that anywhere, ever. In fact, all intelligent criticisms of the actions of the state of Israel I have ever seen are not anti-semitic. But criticising Israel for its mere existence as a Jewish state, is indeed anti-semitic. To seek the dissolution of Israel or a resettlement of its citizens -- which you do seem to argue for in your article, even in the entry statement that "humanity stands offended by the very existence of this Israeli establishment", correct me if I am wrong -- is indeed an argument against the Jewish people and their state. The imposition of violence to remove that state would clearly, *ex vi termini*, be antisemitic.
By the way, and this should already be clear, all this is NOT an excuse, or an apology, or a defense of: (a) the occupation of Palestinian territories in the West Bank; (b) settlements in the West Bank or elsewhere outside the internationally defined boundaries of Israel, (c) the blockade of Gaza, (d) the refusal of the current Israeli government to work towards a viable Palestinian state. I am opposed to all that. I argue against it. It is cruel and unnecessary and counterproductive to peace. But, none of these policies justify arguments against the mere existence of an Israeli state. Its historical origins were tragic, maybe they were even wrong, but they are a historical fact. We can't hold present generations accountable for the past; that is not the way of Progress, but of hatred and of warfare. These are not on my agenda. My point in the end is that you should sharpen your argument by not making statements which indict or threaten an entire people based on their religion, nationality, or creed.
Srinir: What is Zionism? I have heard the word used as a curseword so often, but is it any more than that? If so, how does it relate to my argument? My argument was about way more than one sentence obviously. But I wasn't quoting them all, to avoid labouring the point. Also, please make the effort to note the plurality of viewpoints and actions taken by members of society in Israel. Please don't hold people responsible for governments. It's a classic fallacy, but a very insulting one for many. By this logic, all Iranians would be Islamists, all Americans would be Bushites, all Danish would be islamophobes, all Indians would support the neo-liberal policies of M. Singh, etc. ...
National Liberation struggle of Palestinian People
Phil
Your misunderstanding arises from the fact that you chose to ignore my third and fourth point, where I have mentioned your implicit defence of colonialism and imperialist adventures in the past and that you even argue that we should rather forget it and seek (historically, a little abrupt yet nice-sounding) peaceful solutions (a long history of which I choose to call peace travesties). Repeating myself again, if you ask me, the Israeli-Palestinian question is one of national self-determination. To a certain extent, it is also a race question. In fact, as I have stated, PLO was never an Islamist “terrorist” organisation. Yasir Arafat was a hero in India (as he was in many other places in the third world) because of his commitment to the cause of justice to the Palestinian people and nation. It surprises me that, after a long description, you still shy away from calling Israel a terrorist state.
I can see that you yourself do not make a distinction between Israeli state (regime/establishment, words that I have used) and Israeli people. You suggest (to Srini) that one must appreciate the diversity of opinions within Israel. But misinterpret my opening statement where I have used terms like Israeli regime and "this Israeli establishment". There is no mention, in my article, about Jews/Muslims. Take a look at this statement: “The Israeli military, backed by the American imperial interests, have been indulged in a completely illegal and ruthless colonisation of Palestine since May 14, 1948”. The only place where I identify the religious identities of the groups involved is where I say: “It is high time we return to the basics of the violent and unjust creation of the state of Israel, a white-Jewish state, which was forced through a war on a majority Muslim nation. The inevitable resistance in Palestine concerned a dignified Palestinian nationhood. It was never an “Islamic” terrorist movement.” This is a factual description of history, as you see. In fact, I have emphasized the national liberation element of Palestinian struggle throughout.
The existence of the Israeli regime is offensive to humanity because never before in recent history has a regime killed people with such consistency and overarching impunity; for such a long period of time. Never before in recent history has there been such unanimous and coherent support for a terrorist state globally. It is also about the double standards that the western imperial powers adopt about Israel-sponsored terror and the “Islamist” terror. I know that there are leftist forces in Palestinian as well as Israeli side who understand the history and resultant complications of the conflict. None of them are anti-Semitic, by the way. The Israeli state (a democratic one!), however, does not spare any dissenting voice. Nobody is holding the present generation responsible for the "tragic" (though, I believe it is more than tragic, it has had implication for world peace because of the gross violence and injustice inherent in it) happenings of the past (as you call it, a historical fact now!), but as Saqib argues Israel has consistently used violent and terrorist methods to colonise Palestine. Israeli military has always responded with force and terror to peaceful negotiations. We all know Hamas is only a recent phenomenon. Were there any "militant" Islamists during 1967? Take the current instance where international "non-state" political activists, journalists and peace activists have been targeted indiscriminately. This does not help either. And what happens to "justice" in your co-operative compromise formula?
Wow
If we were to apply your logic to the Indian subcontinent, the states of Pakistan and Bangladesh are illegitimate too. But of course you won't remember that will you. The genocide in East Pakistan never happened. The continued terror policy against India is a media fabrication. India is at fault and should take the first step towards redressing all the wrongs it has inflicted on Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Kindly explain
the problem..it seems a little out of context...
Why Israel
Just in case anyone should need an explanation of why Israel should exist, they should watch "Pourquoi Israel" (English: "Israel, Why") by Claude Lanzmann. In case there should be any question about this, Lanzmann is an outspoken member of the Left, he fought in the French Resistance, worked with Jean Paul Sartre, and openly opposed the French colonial War in Algeria. (http://www.amazon.com/Israel-Pourquoi-NON-USA-FORMAT-Reg-0/dp/B001AO2KEE) - dilip