A Regressive turn of events in the Delhi CPI(M)

Events in the Delhi unit of the CPI(M) have taken an unfortunate and a regressive turn with the expulsion of Albeena Shakil, women activist and former student leader from JNU, from the party for alleged "anti-party activities". A short blogpost carrying information on the events. 

Albeena was a popular student leader in the Jawaharlal Nehru University over the past decade and is remembered for her yeoman work in instituting the Gender Sensitive Committee against Sexual Harassment among other achievements in the progressive campus. Later, as a women activist, she was involved in the organisation of home based workers in various parts of Delhi besides working for other causes. She has also been a regular contributor to Pragoti

The expulsion of Albeena seems to be on rather flimsy grounds and has happened a few days after the expulsion of her spouse Prasenjit Bose who had resigned from the party on the grounds of opposition to the party's support to Pranab Mukherjee's nomination. The sequence of events that led to her expulsion - letters exchanged, showcause notices etc - are now in the public domain (selective bits of which have been published elsewhere in newspapers). The full details (Showcause and Albeena's reply) are attached in this post after receipt. It is left to the reader to judge the judiciousness (or what looks like the certain lack of it) of the disciplinary action. 

This blog post also carries a message from colleagues of Albeena in the student movement in JNU and former SFI activists whose unit itself was dissolved by its national leadership - also for taking a position in political dissent - and whose views (and counterviews) have also been carried by Pragoti. 

Statement titled, "AGAINST KANGAROO COURTS TO SILENCE POLITICAL DISSENT" published here. And reproduced below - 

We the undersigned were expelled from the primary membership of the SFI in a SFI Delhi State Committee Meeting held on 10.07.2012 for taking a dissenting political position against the CPI (M)’s decision to support Pranab Mukherjee in the Presidential Elections. We have learnt that Comrade Albeena Shakil, who was anelected member of the CPI (M) Delhi State Committee has been expelled from the Primary Membership of the CPI (M) in a CPI (M) Delhi State Committee Meeting held on 11.08.2012.We are issuing a statement against this undemocratic expulsion.

———————————————————————-

12.08.2012

We the undersigned have learnt that Comrade Albeena Shakil has been expelled from the primary membership of the CPI (M) on 11.08.2012 for “indulging in anti party activities”. The decision was made in a Delhi State Committee Meeting of the CPI (M) with 17 members voting for the expulsion and 4 opposing it. Prior to this decision another CPI (M) Delhi State Committee meeting held on 20.07.2012 had decided to remove Comrade Albeena from all elected positions in the CPI (M) and Janwadi Mahila Samiti (AIDWA). This decision was in brazen violation of the norms laid down in the CPI (M) Constitution, which categorically says that all decisions regarding disciplinary action (except summary expulsion) have to be taken in the presence of the individual concerned, so that the individual gets an opportunity to offer defense in accordance with the principles of natural justice.

The Delhi CPI (M) leadership flouted the CPI (M) Constitution and initiated disciplinary action against Comrade Albeena. One Delhi State Committee Member of the CPI (M), who has also been a former secretary of the SFIUnit in JNU, had resigned from the Party after the State Committee meeting of 20.07.2012 protesting against the unconstitutional action and unjustifiable persecution. Comrade Albeena was called for the meeting on 11.08.2012 in order to sanctify the earlier unconstitutional decisions and make her listen to further malice. No concrete evidence was provided for the so-called “anti-party activities” in both these meetings except Comrade Albeena’s participation in a National Convention on Campus Democracy and Lyngdoh Recommendations organized by the JNU Students’ Union held on 21.07.2012 and an SFI-JNU Activist Meeting on the JNU student movement held on 1.08.2012. On both these occasions, no act/comment against the CPI (M) was made by her. Comrade Albeena had signed an appeal addressed to the SFI all-India President to resolve the differences with SFI-JNU in a political and democratic manner. 

In the State Committee meeting of 11.08.2012 Comrade Albeena tried to persuade the Delhi State Committee members to adopt a non-confrontational approach towards the SFI-JNU and open political dialogue with them in order to resolve the differences. The fact that this has been construed as “anti-party activities” by the Delhi CPI (M) leadership exposes its undemocratic and authoritarian mindset. 

Comrade Albeena has been elected to the JNU Students’ Union 5 times since 1997, first as a councilor from the School of Languages, then as JNUSU Joint Secretary; twice as the JNUSU Vice President and finally the JNUSU President in 2001. She was in the forefront of the struggle against the communal forces in JNU. She had also played an important role in the struggle for the formation of the Gender Sensitization Committee against Sexual Harassment in JNU. As the JNUSU President in 2001-02, Comrade Albeena provided leadership to the struggle against the imposition of the communal Xth Plan proposals by the BJP-led NDA regime in JNU. She went on to become the Delhi State Secretary and All-India Joint Secretary of the SFI in 2005. 

After completing her Ph.D in English literature from JNU, Comrade Albeena has been working as a whole timer of the CPI (M) in Delhi, with responsibilities in the Janwadi Mahila Samiti. She has been an elected member of the CPI (M) Delhi State Committee since 2007 and the AIDWA Central Executive Committee since 2010. Comrade Albeena’s work in the CPI (M) and JMS included work among poor home based women workers in Delhi, especially in the Muslim dominated areas of Old Delhi and Okhla.

The disciplinary action against Comrade Albeena has to be seen in the aftermath of the draconian and vindictive action against the 4 of us and the “dissolution” of the entire SFI Unit in JNU for a taking dissenting political position vis-à-vis CPI (M)’s decision to support Pranab Mukherjee in the Presidential polls. The desperation of the CPI (M) leadership seems to have only increased after TMC’s decision to support Mr. Mukherjee rendered the so-called “tactical masterstroke” into a laughing stock. All those who have had any association with the SFI in JNU in the past are being threatened and intimidated by the CPI (M) leadership to fall in line and contribute to their disruptive and anti-democratic agenda. The CPI (M) leadership’s paranoia has reached such proportions that all norms of party organization functioning are being thrown to the dustbin to target “suspects” and silence those who have a different opinion. In Comrade Albeena’s case, the Party leadership’s actions further betray a crass patriarchal attitude where she has been victimized for the political actions of her spouse.We appeal to all progressive and democratic sections to condemn the unjust expulsion of Comrade Albeena from the CPI (M) and firmly combat the self-destructive trends within the Left movement,epitomized by the CPI (M) leadership.

Sd/-

Roshan Kishore, P K Anand, Zico Dasgupta, V Lenin Kumar

AttachmentSize
showcause_Albeena.pdf320.07 KB
Albeena Shakil's Reponse to Show Cause Notice.pdf89.44 KB
Your rating: None Average: 3.9 (67 votes)

Comments

Still stuck four years ago?

Still stuck four years ago? Much has changed since then, including you. Please comment on the present.

Unfortunate but inevitable

This post suggests that the GSCASH at JNU was the outcome of one individual's 'yeoman work' - a typical bourgeois interpretation of history obliterating the context and the work of the Left movement and reducing it to individual 'achievements'.

Since her individual achievements have been highlighted, her failings should also have been discussed for the sake of minimum pretence of objectivity by the blogger and the pamphleteers. Albeena Shakil was in charge of the SFI unit in JNU on behalf of the CPIM. From the two documents that have been put up, it seems she has been as much part of the process of splitting the SFI in JNU as the others whom she accuses in her response. From the two documents, it is also clear that she has absloved herself of her political responsibilities as a party member and does not want to own up to a shred of the collective responsibility of first the irrelevance and then the decimation of SFI in JNU. Surely Ms Shakeel was aware of the possible consequences of her actions of the recent past having been a part of the CPIM for quite sometime.

Ms Shakeel who has been part of the AIDWA leadership and has written a few articles on this website (I could not findher 'regular contributions') should have been able to decide between her political calling and her gendered role as a spouse. If she had been able to do that, her expulsion would have not been inevitable.

Lastly, the paranoia of the CPIM has hardly been visible in these events around the Bose faction. The CPIM has done what communist parties would normally do under these circumstances given its structure and organisational principles. But the paranoia of those who wrote this pamphlet is quite clearly visible. Is this martyrdom competition paying any dividends for the Bose faction in JNU?

The CPIM seems to have made only one mistake. It gave too much of a free hand to Mr Bose and his family and friends. For that, it is definitely answerable.

even more unfortunate and avoidable

even more unfortunate and avoidable was the "gendered" role of the spouse of prakash karat who claims to champion women's rights. she seems to have surreptitiously backed the thoroughly unconstitutional practises of the delhi state committee in order to settle scores with a women cadre from the aidwa. has she taken any initiative to talk to albeena shakil even once during this time? if this is what communist parties "normally do", progressive young women will "normally" abhor such parties.

the paranoia of the CPIM is visible in the effort that is being marshalled to post slanderous comments against prasenjit and albeena in this website. this seems to be the redemption for the "mistake' of giving a "free hand" to mr. bose. now free hand is being given to the bestial instincts residing within all CPIM members and their spouses to spew venom against bose and his spouse. keep it up...

So in your view the SFI in

So in your view the SFI in JNU is decimated and irrelevant? Only elections will tell what the students of JNU think about the 'official' SFI OC. You can make as many such proclamations as you like till then.

At least you accept that

At least you accept that those accused by Albeena Shakil for disrupting the SFI-JNU Unit, i.e., the CPI(M) Secretary of Delhi State Committee is responsible for the disruption. What action is the Party willing to take against him for his tomfoolery and violation of Party forms?

RED TAPE

By your comment its proved that these people were involved in anti-party activities. Persenjit, albeen and PMS--- we dont have any problem if party take action and question delhi secretary if he is also responsible? ....but finall it is proved that there was big slandering campaing was initiated aginst the party and its top leadership.

Good that you agree that PMS

Good that you agree that PMS was involved in anti-party activities. Then you would also agree that complaining against his form and constitution violations to others in the Party could not be called slander campaign. The top leadership however has completely endorsed PMS and victimized Albeena for complaining against him.

RED TAPE

What i feel is tha there is no constitutional violation in respect of action against Persenjit and Albeena...both were involved and responsible in cpm bashing and SFI split. They have made number SFI ACTIVISTS apolitical.

"it seems she has been part

"it seems she has been part of the process of splitting the SFI"

where is the concrete evidence comrade?

the show cause issued by the Party completely fails to provide any evidence. all it can come up with is that she attended a JNUSU convention a day after she was unconstitutionally removed from the party state committee and all mass organization committees behind her back. what is the explanation of the Party for violating its own constitution while taking disciplinary action?

can the party take action based on what it wants to believe?

and please stop deluding yourself that there was a split in the jnu-sfi. the entire SFI-JNU Unit was 'dissolved' remember?

Political Bankruptcy leading to hypocritical assertions

I hope the anonymous slanderer would answer some points for the sake of "objectivity":
1. What split in SFI-JNU is Albeena being accused of? The entire SFI unit was dissolved by the SFI leadership after a go ahead from the CPI (M) Delhi Secretary P M S Grewal (In charge of the student front in Delhi) and Sitaram Yechury (In charge of the student front in the Party Centre). No democratic discussion whatsoever was done with the SFI JNU Unit leadership. After doing this a handful of individuals have been popped up as the "official" SFI who are indulging in the worst kind of reactionary slander and mud slinging. Albeena in her capacity as the Student Fraction in charge in Delhi , along with other elected members of the student fraction from JNU was completely sidelined while taking these decisions. It is P M S Grewal who is squarely responsible for the turn of events in JNU SFI.

2. As far as factionalism is concerned, once again certain questions have to be answered. The Delhi Party Secretary P M S Grewal has been openly speaking against sections of the party leadership like Buddhadeb Bhattacharya and Sitaram Yechury. In complete violation of Party norms he showed his letter to the Polit Bureau to comrades from JNU where he had categorically written that the General Secretary has assured the CC that the party would not support any Congress Candidate except Hamid Ansari. After continuously instigating members of lower committee against the Party leadership he has changed colours and turned into an executioner for the party. The CPI (M) by its own logic should first take disciplinary action against P M S Grewal to deter him from instigating others in the future.

3. On the question of gendered roles of a spouse: The Indian Express in which the spouse of Sitaram Yechury holds a senior position carried a story after Prasenjit's resignation that Albeena too had resigned, which was a white lie. The Party later asked Albeena to issue a statement on the basis of such media reports saying that she had not resigned. Isn't this an act to browbeat and victimize a woman comrade for the actions of her spouse?

4. The feudal mentality is evident from the reference about Prasenjit Bose's family and friends. All those being talked about had been elected to leadership positions in the Party and SFI because of their work. May be the "official" SFI Unit in JNU is being built by getting together family and friends.

Oh my my!

Oh my my! Where are all these new insinuations against particular individuals coming from? These charges are not part of Albeena Shakil's reply. Please stick to what you can prove. Ms Shakeel has been expelled by the CPIM, not by any individual.

Once one goes to the media, one has to bear its pitfalls. Since you have accused two persons of feeding the HT, please also tell us who is feeding Anand Bazar Patrika which has suddenly discovered the wonders of Mr Bose and the bosons around him. Also Ms Mustafa's columns in Statesman on this issue are surely being fed by some other source, not to mention the space in Outlook.

Ms Shakil consciously decided to do what normally would be considered violation of party discipline in a communist party. You are taking away her agency by claiming she has been victimized because of her husband's actions.

The 'work' of those who are part of the Bose faction is not evident here though I am sure those who elected them at the time believed in their work and acumen. But sadly, they have put family and personal loyalties above those political roles. If Ms Shakil could not put her political responsibilities above her gendered role as spouse, then the source of the logic of family and fedual subservience is clear here.

The 'official' SFI in JNU is not the subject of this particular post and so that last line is merely a sectarian dig. It is amusing for a Pragoti reader who has nothing to do with either SFI or JNU.

Please read the reply of Ms

Please read the reply of Ms Shakil again. These charges are very much part of her reply.

If you mean about Sitaram Yechury, being the overall student front incharge from the Party, he held a meeting with the all-India SFI leadership on the decision to dissolve the SFI-JNU Unit. He could find time for that, but not for sitting even once with the JNU-SFI. Vindictive...just one word for it.

It is Ms Shakil who is

It is Ms Shakil who is accusing the party of being sexist. Seems perfectly credible after reading the show cause. The Delhi State Secretary is calling her a 'deserter' while she was still in the Party. What could be greater proof of the fact that the party accused her of things that her husband did? Please stop you 'gyan' on gender issues and engage in some introspection.

On "amusing" conspiracy theories

1. The first comment accused Albeena of leading a split in the SFI as the in charge of the SFI in JNU. I don't see how the Delhi Party and All India incharge can escape responsibility when Albeena was not even involved in any of the deliberations. The "Bosons" were after all not put into the Large Hedron Collider which stopped the party/SFI leadership from discussing things with them democratically.

2. As far as leaks to the media are concerned you should find out where all the "anti Prakash - pro Buddha/Bengal" line plants came from. Why is it the case that the tactical hobnobbing with Congress line finds its way through ABP and not in party forums. If you want to brand Seema Mustafa also as a boson then the Party should open a media school to produce journalists who would articulate views of the left.

3. The CPI (M) leadership took away Albeena's agency by clubbing her with Prasenjit.

I like the second point. It

I like the second point. It is nice to see people getting converted to Budhism suddenly. A competition is now going on to find out who is the greatest Budhist or should I say, the true incarnation of Budha. Budham saranam Gachami!!! :)

From Buddhism to Bossism

The ideology called Buddhism became unpopular after the electoral defeat in Bengal. But the defeat has given rise to a minor cult called Bosism (also known as 'bossism') in certain hamlets in South Delhi which seems to have created driven bosons out of ex-Buddhists who are out on a random walk in JNU as free radicals. By definition, free radicals tend to be unstable and highly reactive.

And these developments have

And these developments have made a few individuals who are not with the Party become the biggest defenders of the worst actions of the CPI(M). Ridiculous!

How ridiculous can you get

How ridiculous can you get comrades! So people who are not with the Party do not have any right to take positions on the Party's actions? Only Party members can defend the Party's actions and everyone lese has to be against it just because you are against it? Most people who have signed the petition to P K Biju are also not with the Party. Who is being ridiculous here?

everybody has a right to take

everybody has a right to take positions. only that those who are driven by petty motives expose themselves by targetting individuals and settle personal scores rather than commenting on substantive issues. if you want to defend the party, do it on the merits of its decisions. not by launching personal attacks against the critics of the party.

The personal attacks and

The personal attacks and targetting are in the blog post.

Where is the 'political substance' in this blog post? It is just a personalised sob story.

Sad to see Pragoti degenerate into a personal space for sob stories.

And finally, so all of you who call yourself JNU SFI are 'critics of the party'.

Then why call yourself SFI?

SFI is the students' wing of the party and led by the party.

the "official" SFI that is

the "official" SFI that is the student wing of CPM had a procession of 25 persons yesterday in JNU...the SFI-JNU unit had a 200 strong procession in JNU tonight. so much for your slanderous attacks, "dissolution" of sfi-jnu unit and expulsion of albeena shakil. students have given a tight slap on your face.

Also got to know that SFI-JNU

Also got to know that SFI-JNU membership in the University just crossed 1000 a few days back...forget about 'official' SFI, even AISA should beware of this new political development of the Left in JNU!

Bosism indeed!A unit has been

Bosism indeed!A unit has been dissolved undemocratically, the wonderful leaders refuse to engage in any discussion or debate (PK Biju's reply to an appeal by former JNU-SFI activists is a case in point) and now all the comrades are being dismissed as mindless creatures who follow any line set by Prasenjit Bose. Ex-Buddhists, driven bosons -aren't you ashamed to say these things about people you probably called comrades not so long ago?

Dear Comrade Sanctimonious

Comrade sanctimonious, one boson at least has had the honesty to admit that she or he prefers bossism in JNU. What more debate and engagement can there be when the documents put forward by Albeena Shakil's sympathisers are all insinuations, mudslinging and counter-accusations. Where is the political content to 'debate and engage'?

Please do not assume that the bosons had ever been my comrades - I shudder to even contemplate that thought given the record of undemocratic actions in JNU SFI in the past decade led by Bose and Bosons.

so you have the right to

so you have the right to vilify, slander and then expel a woman activist and the burden of "engagement" is on the sympathisers of albeena shakil...sanctimonious indeed. very grewalesque...

To the honest slanderer

Dear Anonymous Slanderer,

I would rather be sanctimonious than stick my head in the sand and refuse to take notice of what goes around me. You find the documents supporting Com. Albina to consist of "insinuations, mudslinging and counter-accusations"? Have you taken a good look at the show-cause notice issued by the Party? Forget political content, it reads like a 5th standard child's essay. And none of your insinuations answer my question as to why none of the national leaders found it necessary to debate and discuss anything with SFI-JNU unit members. But considering the fact that the SFI President voted for Pranab Mukherjee, the worst FM this country has ever seen, to be President, I am not surprised at their spinelessness. It is difficult to debate when you don't have answers.

bosism preferred over karatism, yechuri thought and buddha-biman

bosism or bossism seems to be certainly a preferred choice for most who were in the SFI in JNU than karatism, yechuri thought and buddha-biman theory!! else, why did the cpm dissolve the entire sfi unit in jnu? the shameless leaders of the cpm are now taking their frustration out by abusing young activists who have shown the courage to stand by their political convictions. they are the hope for the future, if the left has a future in this country. spent and defeated leaders of the cpm should now call it a day. they should retire and save the left movement of further embarrassment.

and finally ageism

ageist views and this celebration of youth are rather cliched. young and old activists have stood up for their courage and convictions over time to build up and sustain the left movement. what is on display around Bose and his followers is a lack of political conviction and the inability to stand up and defend their own acts and actions. it has nothing to do with age or being abused. on the contrary, bosons seem very adept at abusing and personally attacking anyone who differs with them at any point of time. it has to do with lack of self-criticism combined with sheer opportunism and defeatism fuelled by arrogant elitism. a sad waste of precious youth!

"lack of self-criticism

"lack of self-criticism combined with sheer opportunism and defeatism fuelled by arrogant elitism"...what imagination comrade! are you describing the the CPI (M) Polit Bureau by any chance? many voters of west bengal will agree...

would you be honest enough to

would you be honest enough to state what your age is?

better wasted trying some

better wasted trying some principled left politics for a change than just wasting it for the compromises of an adamant and unprincipled CPI(M) leadership which is failing to bring about course correction.

That is really an honest

That is really an honest confession! I have been following this SFI JNU fiasco for all this time and was waiting when this confession will finally be made. So for those in SFI in JNU, it was always about individual leaders? According to you, either you do Karatism or you do Buddhism (and now Bossism), anybody interested in doing CPI(M) or SFI? At least now it is clear that the SFI split was led and directed by Bose. No more confusion on this. It is because of these individualistic tendencies, long harboured within, that these misdirected folks have jumped out of a ship (CPIM) in trouble. Good, that they did so, but they forgot to take their life-jackets (the politics of collective left, which could have saved them) and hence now they are grappling to survive in the midst of an ocean of slander and apolitics! Lets hope they see reason in better times...

CPM has long abandoned

CPM has long abandoned marxism...that is why buddhism, karatism, yechury thought and of late "feudal stalinism with grewalesque characterestics" are predominating...in this confusing milieu some sad souls are finding solace in bosism...why blame those poor fellows alone??

Troubled Ship or Albatross around the neck

In politics ships don't entered troubled waters because of unpredictable storms. Why the CPI (M) is a troubled ship needs to be answered. It is because of the leadership's continuous sabotage of Party's principled political positions. The JNU SFI had to face the brunt of these unprincipled decisions. At least the JNU SFI leadership did not stop attending meetings of the SFI or CPI (M) after electoral debacles and abandon "the politics of collective left".

so bose is holding greater

so bose is holding greater sway over young comrades in JNU than Karat and Yechury now?

i think such embarrassing admissions must not be made for the sake of the Party.

Whose paranoia?

"This post suggests that the GSCASH at JNU was the outcome of one individual's 'yeoman work' - a typical bourgeois interpretation of history obliterating the context and the work of the Left movement and reducing it to individual 'achievements'.;

This post does not suggest anything of the kind. It only acknowledges the yeoman role of one individual in the whole effort. It will be a grave injustice if the effort of one is not lauded even if it is part of a collective. Nothing can be less "bourgeois" than that. [Just like a worker's effort is ignored in the praise given to an employer for a new product]. A few of her regular contributions to this site are mentioned in the link. It takes only a click to check them out and see their worth. Just as it takes only a little bit of sense to see who has disrupted what from the letters above and in the summary expulsions, alleged but non-existing form violations and dissolutions, who is being paranoid.

an even more paranoid response

Please read the previous comment carefully before putting up the even more paranoid response. Where does the worker/employer logic come? Was Ms Shakil an 'employee' of the CPI(M)? Why is the observation on her contribution to this site vexing you so much? She has written a few articles on this website. So have many others. Why should that be of any consideration in the discussion on her expulsion which did not have anything to do with her articles on this website? Was her writings here part of her responsibilities as a CPI(M) leader in Delhi? Making insinuations about other people's senses is a weak argument and in bad taste. The onus is still on the blogger and the pamphleteers to convince the reader and not vice-versa.

Onus?

"Yeoman effort" clearly means workmanlike, loyal and sincere effort. "Just as" is used to compare, to identify similarity and not to suggest a direct example. The writer above clearly has a problem with comprehension.

If it is mentioned that the person in question has contributed to the website, why does it irk this reader? Is this reader jealous as seems the case? The blog clearly mentions that Albeena has been a popular student and women's activist in Delhi and adding that she is also a contributor to this site cannot surely be a basis for a negative, flustered reaction.

Blogs such as the above are not meant to convince those who are already prejudiced and are insensitive to reason. They are for those who are able to think things through clearly and without prejudice.

Onus of name-calling

The responder above sems to be losing it completely. Only name-calling instead of responding to the issues raised in the comment - - another hallmark of undemocratic functioning.

I am not prejudiced about Ms Shakeel. Nor do I have any reason to be 'jealous' of Ms Shakeel. In fact her situation is unenvious at the moment and I do wish resilience.

However the blogger and whoever is batting for her through the comments here are just exposing their intolerance to any differing views through the comments.

please do not use big words

please do not use big words like 'tolerance'. It is clear to all how intolerant the cpim has become.

The party is reaching new

The party is reaching new lows day by day.

Pragoti is a now coterie of Neo Left

Sorry to say Pragoti has bacame mouthpiece of socalled champion true leftist, the deepest red in world history. These leftist has already done greatest revolution of world history. India and its people is now free of any abuse, hunger , sexual abuse etc. All jobs has done, only job is pending to publish and prove to the world how synical CPIM is and its followers. Pragoti and SFI JNU already proved that CPIM is the most wretched party in world history. Please leave this chapter; it is enough. We all are expecting these people of RED MARS will show the path of true communism!!!!!!!

Long back I read one proverb "Nobody kicks a dead dog"

so the CPI(M) is a 'dead dog'

so the CPI(M) is a 'dead dog' according to you. i can only say that the ultra-left has been trying but has failed to win the support of the masses. Please do some introspection about yourself and where you are positioned. whatever may be expected of these people and pragoti, atleast nothing is expected of the ultra-left.

The party has just seen new

The party has just seen new lows and not the real low which they will see in the panchayet election in bengal due next year. The theory of driving wedge between congress and trinamul will be reinvented by the Bengal CPI-M with the rubber stamp from JNU bred puppets like Prakash and Yechuri (Yechuri has been hobnobbing with the corrupt bengal satraps for a long time). We will be happy if their theory of driving wedge actually drives a wedge in some specific portions of their body parts, at least that will be a great contribution to the party, so that some good sense and concerns from below enter them for good. I hope the bosons will sincerely wait for that historical juncture and not lag behind in defending the discredited party unlike the arrogant bootleakers of the leadership.

RED TAPE

Party has seen many lows and down in its history but party has always faced them bravely and will face them again. What happens in bengal in panchayat election - will. But kind lows i am seeing people like you your bose is unexpected. I can see now you guys leaking the boots of neo-liberal leaders by attacking CPM and its leadership on non-issues.

on democracy

for the last 4 year albeena shakeel was the incharge of delhi sfi (not just jnu unit of sfi) and in those 4 years delhi sfi is on decline coz albeena never allowed sfi to work properly through fora's democratically. the unit conference of sfi i jnu took place this year 2012 after a gap of atleast 2 year. the delhi state of sfi never become functional there was not a single meeting of delhi state sfi 4 last one and a half year. before the recent jnusu election also there were no meetings albeena was repeatedly uttering this one liner that JO JNUSU WAPAS LAEGA WO HI JNUSU JEETEGA and she along with the bosons was claiming that 'they' are going to win 3 seats of the jnusu but 'they' lost drastically and that was one of the worst performance of sfi in jnu. however in the review meeting it was noted that taking the single agenda of restoring the jnusu alone without any other political issue or issue of the campus was the biggest mistake. only fools can believe that she has no role in what happened in jnu recently on the simple fact that she along with her spouse(boss) never allowed sfi i jnu to work on its own democratically. her expulsion was inevitable.

albeena has been

albeena has been masterminding sfi's decline and defeat in jnu. she has personally overseen sfi's activities in jnu - and we have all seen the many campus-level mistakes sfi has made there thanks to her disastrous decisions, for which cpim's party line can in no way be blamed. did cpim pb tell them to support nestle? or jnusu president to run away from ugbm? why no positive initiatives by sfi in her leadership? of course it was natural for her to make jnusu elections the sole political issue for sfi, because that was sfi's lone claim to initiative and activism, in fact.
now that sfi is free of bose & co, it will revive.

the only problem is that you

the only problem is that you are saying all this today after albeena has been expelled from the party and the party leadership has given you license to vilify her and the entire SFI organisation in JNU from 2001 onwards. if your allegations are true, why did the party appoint her as the student front in-charge till the other day? do you realize that had her expulsion not taken place you would have been expelled from the party for saying all this. please have some shame before vomiting out such filth. do not act like a lunatic ranting at the behest of the culpable party leaders.

and imagine such incompetent

and imagine such incompetent people are managing to hold greater sway over JNU comrades than the Delhi Party State Secretary. Speaks volumes about his competence.

and imagine such incompetent

and imagine such incompetent people are managing to hold greater sway over JNU comrades than the Delhi Party State Secretary. Speaks volumes about his competence.