PRAGOTI

1. “SFI has never indulged in going into specific decisions taken by this or that political party. We made it amply clear that it is absolutely imperative to maintain the independent character of SFI and not be overly bothered by decisions of political parties.” (Why SFI should not?) More over what is this traditional outlook towards political issues that “sfi have never indulged “So can I take it as, if not done before will not be doing in future? (It’s confusing !!! :”() ).
2. “We made it amply clear that it is absolutely imperative to maintain the independent character of SFI and not be overly bothered by decisions of political parties” (Did SFI CE take any stand on Nandhigram issue then, and when SFI JNU was trying to defend CPIM was not against SFI’s ‘independent character’? (It’s contradictory and confusing :”(), :”()).
3. “Study and struggle” hmmm ya… its student’s perspective “but vocal in issues of education and employment” Employment? Is it? If so why not on Presidential Election of the country? (It’s logical incompatible, contradictory and confusing :”() :”() :”())
4. The Students’ Federation of India declares itself as an united and broad based mass organisation of students and not a political party but is primarily interested in the upliftment and betterment of the student community and pledges to zealously protect the independent, scientific, progressive, democratic and secular character of its organisation” (does SFI (or who drafted the note!!!!) have definitions of what is independent, scientific, progressive, democratic and secular character?) because when an political discussion is raised and the answer given is that the arguments are not independent, scientific, progressive, democratic and secular character than what else is independent, scientific, progressive, democratic and secular character? (ooopssssss…… I need to solve the puzzle :”() (sorry for repeating the same words).

What else? Very disappointing. :”()