"For the last two decades we have given importance to the person holding the constitutional position. S/he should have firm secular credentials."
So Abdul Kalam was not supported because he was 'personally' communal? Another unconvincing reasoning. That is bound to happen if you try to justify a wrong decision.
"For the last two decades we
"For the last two decades we have given importance to the person holding the constitutional position. S/he should have firm secular credentials."
So Abdul Kalam was not supported because he was 'personally' communal? Another unconvincing reasoning. That is bound to happen if you try to justify a wrong decision.